DISAGREE with the optimism here. This is just another layer of red tape that complicates what should be a simple process. Why should someone have to wait six months to reapply if rejected? That's half a year of lost income and opportunities.
I must disagree here. Focusing on too broad a range of occupations could dilute the effectiveness of the ISL. It's essential to prioritize and address the most critical skill shortages first. Expanding the list indiscriminately might lead to less strategic talent management.
Yes he raises an important issue. While focusing on infrastructure is good, we must balance investment to ensure other sectors are not neglected. Diversification is key.
I'm not convinced about spending billions on Mars exploration. Earth has its own share of problems that need immediate attention. How do we justify these expenditures?
DISAGREE with the notion that this will solve the housing crisis. It feels like a band-aid on a bullet wound. The real issues are deeper and require more than just adjusting investment thresholds. What about the locals who are already priced out of the market?
I don't see it that way. The stringent requirements are necessary to ensure only truly extraordinary talent makes it through. It's a measure of quality control, not a deterrent.
I disagree. The point is to prioritize local employment, which is crucial for any country. The increased fees and sponsorship consistency are there to ensure only serious employers and individuals go through the process, which ultimately benefits the local economy.
I DISAGREE. The benefits CLEARLY outweigh the cons. It’s not just about tourism; it’s about strengthening ties between nations. Plus, the UAE is more than capable of handling an influx of tourists. They’ve been doing it for years!
I totally DISAGREE with this new policy! It’s a huge inconvenience for those of us who travel for work. Surely, they could have continued allowing representatives to handle this?
I disagree with the notion that these updates are solely positive. The heightened penalties and immediate action requirements could exacerbate the fear among employers of hiring EEA nationals, potentially leading to discriminatory hiring practices. While compliance is important, there needs to...
Totally disagree with the notion that this will hurt small businesses. It's about protecting workers, not penalizing businesses that are doing the right thing. Compliance is part of running a business responsibly.
I DISAGREE with the cap! It’s unfair to limit opportunities for international students who bring so much diversity and enrichment to our campuses. This move feels like a step back in promoting global education and inclusivity. Canada should remain open and welcoming to students from all over the...
I don't agree with this approach. We should be training more doctors domestically instead of relying on foreign physicians. It's a short-term solution to a long-term problem.
I DISAGREE with the notion that increasing English language requirements is a positive step. It's actually going to make it harder for many international students who could contribute but may not have a strong English background. Seems more exclusionary than beneficial.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.